Majic Projects
Majic Ansible Roles
Go to the previous open issue
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
icon_project.png Majic Ansible Roles / Closed Feature request MAR-39 Set-up of basic LDAP structure in LDAP server role
action_vote_minus_faded.png
0
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
Go to the next open issue
This issue has been closed with status "Closed" and resolution "RESOLVED".
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Feature request
  • Category
    Not determined
  • Targetted for
    1.0.0
  • Status
    Closed
  • Progress
  • Priority
    Not determined
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (0)
There are no items
People involved
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
  • Estimated time
    4 hours
  • Time spent
    No time spent
    Click here to see time logged against this issue
Issue details
  • Resolution
    RESOLVED
Attachments (0)
There is nothing attached to this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates
Description
At the moment the LDAP server role does nothing to set-up any kind of LDAP directory structure.

However, a number of roles, such as mail server and XMPP server, depend on having a specific LDAP directory structure available and populated.

It would be beneficial if the role took care of at least some of the work for setting-up the directory structure for these other roles.

In particular, the role should:

* Create the ou=people, ou=services, and ou=groups under base DN.
* Have an option to generate entries needed for the mail server set-up (ou=domains,ou=mail and ou=aliases,ou=mail under ou=services).
* Have an option for creating login entries for apps under ou=services (such as cn=postfix,ou=services, cn=dovecot,ou=servicces...). It should be possible to remove services this way as well (some kind of absent thing).
* Have an option for creating group entries under ou=groups. It should be possible to remove such groups too. Group membership should not be managed.
Todos (0 / 0)
Issue created